Sambung membaca: Ada Melayu Yang Dibaruakan Oleh Cina DAP?
Surat yang bertarikh 5 Disember 2015 itu menyebut dengan jelas bahawa “”Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang telah meluluskan” sumbangan sebanyak RM40,000 untuk program Freemason – “International Scottish Masonic Conference 2016”.
Apakah agenda LGE untuk meluluskan program sedemikian rupa?
Nga Kor Ming, Malaysian politician and Member of Parliament for the Taiping seat under the DAP flag, posted a picture on his Facebook page in which they photoshopped Lim Kit Siang, Tun Mahathir and Muhyiddin as Captain America, Hulk and Hawkeye (superheroes from the Marvel Comics).
Captain America has always been known as the leader of the Avengers. He is incorruptible and as near to a perfectly good human being as anyone can get. He will not compromise his principles for anything, not even his life. And he is one of the few deemed worthy to lift the Mjolnir– Thor(the Norse god of lightning)’s hammer. Even Batman has once admitted that Captian America can defeat him in a fight.
What a great hero he is!
Hulk possesses an immense superhuman strength, stamina, durability, endurance, and longevity. But, as everyone knows, he also has a big anger management issue. Once he turns into the big, green guy, there is a big chance that he won’t be able to control his rage and might destroy a whole town if no one stops him. In fact, he has been frequently used by many villains to cause chaos inside the team itself by instigating his anger.
He is constantly a very dangerous ticking time bomb.
Then we have the reluctant-villain-turned-hero, Hawkeye, who, despite being a well-loved sidekick, he really is just a novice in the Avengers team and even though he has led the Secret Avengers team, he usually carries more of a soldier role than being a leader himself.
Why does Nga Kor Ming pose Lim Kit Siang as the Captain America, Tun Mahathir as Hulk and Muhyiddin as Hawkeye?
Is it a way of saying that Lim Kit Siang is the actual leader of the team while Tun Mahathir is a man with bad anger management issues and has a tendency of randomly stomping his way around like a mad monster and Muhyiddin is no more than just a mere soldier for Lim Kit Siang?
Di mana salahnya kita perkasakan akidah anak-anak muda dengan penganjuran seminar dan ceramah pemurnian akidah?
PELAMPAU EVANGELIS KRISTIAN bebas berkeliaran memurtadkan orang-orang Islam – TETAPI apabila kita berusaha mendedahkan AGENDA JAHAT TIPU HELAH mereka, mereka mula membuat bising.
Dalam isu penganjuran Seminar Pemurnian Aqidah di UiTM Melaka Sabtu lalu, kenapa PELAMPAU EVANGELIS Kristian ganas membuat bising?
Yang patut dipersoalkan ialah kenapa ada “SPY” yang menyelinap masuk dalam seminar yang dari awal lagi dikhaskan hanya untuk pelajar Islam sebagai sebahagian dari program ACIS. NIAT BUSUK dan JAHAT “spy” ini jelas sengaja membuat kecoh. Niat pelajar tersebut sepatutnya disiasat. Paderi yang mula menyebar FITNAH dan HASUTAN tersebut mesti disiasat kerana niat jahatnya.
Ini hak kita yang dilindungi oleh Perlembagaan Persekutuan – Perkara 11 Fasal 4:
Undang-undang Negeri dan berkenaan dengan Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Labuan dan Putrajaya, undangundang persekutuan boleh mengawal atau…
View original post 80 more words
Untuk tempahan dan pesanan.
The Armies of God: A Study in Militant Christianity
View original post 322 more words
But now, watching his actions and listening to what he says today, I am no longer sure if those words which made him the “Hero of the Malays”, really came from his heart or if they were all just a part of his sickly, twisted game.
“Sesungguhnya tidak ada yang lebih menyayat hati
Dari melihat bangsaku dijajah
Tidak ada yang lebih menyedihkan
dari membiarkan bangsaku dihina
Air mata tiada ertinya
Sejarah silam tiada maknanya
Sekiranya bangsa tercinta terpinggir
Dipersenda dan dilupakan”– Tun Dr. Mahathir in Perjuangan Belum Selesai
Did he mean it when he wrote that it pierced his heart when the Malays were forced to bow down to the ‘penjajah’? That nothing was more heart-wrenching then seeing his own race being insulted?
That tears are worthless and history is meaningless if our own race, our own religion are being forgotten– being stepped on– being shunned?
Because if he did, how can he ever bear to be together with those people who, clearly from the emblems and the banners they hold up high, are discriminating and humiliating his own race and religion?
How can he support the illegal demonstration which is being led by the people he himself has labeled as ‘pengkhianat bangsa’?
Tun Mahathir himself has once said that the Malays who join the opposition’s illegal assemblies are greedy and selfish people– does this means that he is one too?
Were all of his past actions merely acts for his own political gain? Did any of his own words ever came from his heart? Are all the tears he shed for the country actually crocodile tears?
Looking at his actions now, I think we were fooled by his twisted, malicious game.
It is still very hard for me to accept the harsh reality. The man who is now spreading lies and false words about the government and supporting the enemies and the greedy monkeys is the same man that I used to respect.
I still want to believe that he is just being tricked, being fooled to support Bersih 4; but again, he is not a child who can be fooled easily.
How can he forget the people who had once threatened to ‘sweep out’ the Malays from our own land with giant brooms while chanting the words, “Melayu Sakai!” and “Melayu Balik Hutan!”?
He is no more a hero to me.
He is a hypocrite who acted against his own words.
He always said, “Melayu Mudah Lupa… “; now it looks like Mahathir Sudah Lupa…
Or does he thinks that since, “Melayu Mudah Lupa… “, he is free to do anything because soon, we’ll forget his bad deeds?
Selamat menyambut hari kemerdekaan ke 58 kepada semua rakyat Malaysia!
Happy 58th Independence Day to all Malaysians!
Negara berdaulat, Islam dimartabat. Rakyat cemerlang, Malaysia gemilang.
Reading an open letter to the people of Malaysia by a “group of retired Malay civil servants” of G25, I am amused by their lack of knowledge on the the Federal Constitution while at the same time they are questioning the government authorities on this matter.
The members of G25 wrote that:
“The on-going debate over these matters display a lack of clarity and understanding on the place of Islam within our constitutional democracy.”
Despite the fact that the place of Islam has been clearly stated in Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia where it states that, “Islam is the religion of the Federation” and in Article 37(1) of the Federal Constitution where it states that the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong must pledge under the name of Allah to uphold Islam; G25 still thinks that there is “a lack of clarity and understanding on the place of Islam within our constitutional democracy.”
“The Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall before exercising his functions take and subscribe before the Conference of Rulers and in the presence of the Chief Justice of the Federal Court (or in his absence the next senior judge of the Federal Court available) the oath of office set out in Part I of the Fourth Schedule; and the oath shall be attested by two persons appointed for the purpose by the Conference of Rulers.”-Article 37(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia
“Wallahi: Wabillahi: Watallahi,
Maka dengan lafaz ini berikrarlah Kami dengan sesungguhnya dan dengan sebenarnya mengaku akan taat setia pada menjalankan dengan adilnya pemerintahan bagi Malaysia dengan mengikut sebagaimana undang-undang dan Perlembagaan yang telah disahkan dan dimasyurkan dan akan disah dan dimasyurkan di masa hadapan ini. Dan lagi Kami berikrar mengaku dengan sesungguh dan dengan sebenarnya memeliharakan pada setiap masa Agama Islam dan berdiri tetap di atas permintaan yang adil dan aman di dalam Negeri.”-The oath taken by the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong
G25 understands Malaysia as a constitutional democracy country when Malaysia is actually a federal constitutional monarchy and not a constitutional democracy. I have no idea where did these retired Malay civil servants get the idea that our constitution is a democratic constitution when the word “democracy” has never be mentioned in our Federal Constitution.
G25 went on with their bizarre prattles to “refer specifically to the current situation where religious bodies seem to be asserting authority beyond their jurisdiction; where issuance of various fatwa violate the Federal Constitution” when JAKIM has been protecting Islam as the religion of the Federation as mentioned in Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution.
Calling themselves moderate Muslims, they also mentioned that they “are particularly concerned with the statement issued by Minister Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom, in response to the recent Court of Appeal judgement on the right of transgendered women to dress according to their identity. He viewed the right of the transgender community and Sisters in Islam (SIS) to seek legal redress as a “new wave of assault on Islam” and as an attempt to lead Muslims astray from their faith, and put religious institutions on trial in a secular court.”
The act of redressing is very much forbidden in Islam and as the Minister of Islamic Affairs, it is in fact Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom’s duty to alert the Islamic community in Malaysia of these new wave of assault towards Islam.
I find it funny how G25 wants the people of Malaysia to support the freedom and liberty (freedom from limits on thought or behaviour) of the people with extreme behaviours such as crossdressing, switching genders and other related queer behaviour when these abnormal behaviours had once been classified as a mental illness. In fact, it has been reported that gay men have significantly higher rates of mood and anxiety disorders than straight men.
The end note however is the most absurd. It states that:
“When Islam was revealed to our Prophet saw in 7th century Arabia, it was astoundingly revolutionary and progressive. Over the centuries, the religion has guided believers through harsh and challenging times. It is our fervent belief that for Islam to continue to be relevant and universal in our times, the understanding, codification and implementation of the teachings of our faith must continue to evolve. Only with this, can justice, as enjoined by Allah swt, prevail.”
After the Fattah Makkah, Saidina Abu Bakr r.a. knew that the time for the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. to return to Allah s.w.t. was coming near because the Prophet’s quest to deliver Islam to the mankind has been fulfilled. This proves the fact that Islam has been perfected to it’s truest and most divine state. So, why must we revolutionise such a beautiful and perfect religion? The Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. has entrusted us to protect, defend and uphold Islam as how it is. Allah s.w.t. is all knowing. Allah knows what is perfect for us and Allah gives us what we need, not what we want. Do these Malay Muslims not have faith in Allah? Do they not trust Allah to know what is perfect for us?
Why must Islam be adapted to our evolving world and not the world adapt to the perfect guidelines of Islam?